Canon vs Sony camera: tested at Diergaarde Blijdorp zoo
In this blogpost, I will show you how the new Canon EOS M50 camera compared to my Sony DSC-RX100M3 camera. While I mainly filmed in 4K at the Diergaarde Blijdorp zoo with the Canon camera, I asked someone else who came along to use my Sony camera (the compact camera that I normally use for on the road aka my blogger selfie/vlog camera) to take pictures and film things too. This way, I could compare the two cameras by looking at the pictures and videos afterwards.
You might wonder why I would compare two cameras with very different prices and specs. But I was offered the opportunity to test the Canon EOS M50 camera and to buy it at a discounted price afterwards. I was really enthusiastic about it, as I use my DSLR too little because of how heavy it is and my compact camera isn't powerful enough sometimes.
Underneath, you can find a compilation video of all the pictures and video clips that was taken with the Sony DSC-RX100M3 camera at the Diergaarde Blijdorp zoo. Some video clips might look similar if you watched the 4K videos that I posted before (good for comparision), but don't worry, there is still plenty of fresh content in there to keep this long video interesting.
I really like the Sony camera, as it is very small and lightweight. You can also immediately take the picture that you want within seconds. You just need to press the on/off button, the lens will automatically come out, and it's ready to use. With the Canon camera, I needed to take the lens cap off, push and hold the lens switch and manually rotate the lens out, before I can do anything. It takes some time to do that. However, it is possible to leave the lens rotated out, while the camera is off, so that you can take the next shot immediately, and the smaller retracted lens made it less bulky and easier to carry in my normal handbag (as in: not needing a special camera bag). But I like the screen of the Sony camera more, as you can move it above the camera (you can check how you look like in the picture or video by looking above the lens instead of at the far side). It is a small detail, but important if you regularly take selfies and film yourself by yourself.
Comparing the pictures and video clips was unfair, as the pictures are 20.1 MP vs 24.1 MP and one was filmed with Full HD and one with 4K. I could very clearly see the difference by the vibrance of the colors, the stability during filming, and the many details in the pictures and video clips. The Canon camera is hands down the winner here.
I have taken quite a long time to figure out if I wanted to keep it and ultimately, I decided to not send it back and buy it. Compared to my Canon DSLR camera (with a good macro and zoom lens), the Canon EOS M50 with the 15-45 mm lens isn't perfect, but I liked the quality of the pictures and videos so much that I think it is worth the investment.
As a side note, I have to add that I was not the one who continuously used flash on the animals (I actually never used flash in the zoo, although some people seemed to look at me and think to themselves that it is the Chinese again, who don't follow the rules).
You might wonder why I would compare two cameras with very different prices and specs. But I was offered the opportunity to test the Canon EOS M50 camera and to buy it at a discounted price afterwards. I was really enthusiastic about it, as I use my DSLR too little because of how heavy it is and my compact camera isn't powerful enough sometimes.
Underneath, you can find a compilation video of all the pictures and video clips that was taken with the Sony DSC-RX100M3 camera at the Diergaarde Blijdorp zoo. Some video clips might look similar if you watched the 4K videos that I posted before (good for comparision), but don't worry, there is still plenty of fresh content in there to keep this long video interesting.
What do I think?
I am not a camera expert, so I won't go into the details and just share a bit about how suitable the two cameras are for blogging.I really like the Sony camera, as it is very small and lightweight. You can also immediately take the picture that you want within seconds. You just need to press the on/off button, the lens will automatically come out, and it's ready to use. With the Canon camera, I needed to take the lens cap off, push and hold the lens switch and manually rotate the lens out, before I can do anything. It takes some time to do that. However, it is possible to leave the lens rotated out, while the camera is off, so that you can take the next shot immediately, and the smaller retracted lens made it less bulky and easier to carry in my normal handbag (as in: not needing a special camera bag). But I like the screen of the Sony camera more, as you can move it above the camera (you can check how you look like in the picture or video by looking above the lens instead of at the far side). It is a small detail, but important if you regularly take selfies and film yourself by yourself.
Comparing the pictures and video clips was unfair, as the pictures are 20.1 MP vs 24.1 MP and one was filmed with Full HD and one with 4K. I could very clearly see the difference by the vibrance of the colors, the stability during filming, and the many details in the pictures and video clips. The Canon camera is hands down the winner here.
I have taken quite a long time to figure out if I wanted to keep it and ultimately, I decided to not send it back and buy it. Compared to my Canon DSLR camera (with a good macro and zoom lens), the Canon EOS M50 with the 15-45 mm lens isn't perfect, but I liked the quality of the pictures and videos so much that I think it is worth the investment.
As a side note, I have to add that I was not the one who continuously used flash on the animals (I actually never used flash in the zoo, although some people seemed to look at me and think to themselves that it is the Chinese again, who don't follow the rules).